The Misunderstood Pyramid: Revisiting Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Maslow’s Hierarchy Of Needs Is BS

Photo by Noah Buscher on Unsplash

The Origin of the Pyramid Structure

The innate human quest to understand and categorize the intricacies of our emotions, motivations, and behaviours has birthed a plethora of psychological theories.

One that stands out, and is often a staple in introductory psychology classes, is Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

Presented as a structured guide to our deepest desires and motivations, it has been depicted time and again as a progressive pyramid. This tidy, hierarchical representation has found its way into textbooks, classrooms, and corporate training sessions.

Contrary to widespread belief, however, the iconic pyramid was not Maslow’s design.

In 1960, an article surfaced in Business Horizons by consultant psychologist Charles McDermid. He proposed a visually compelling idea: why not illustrate Maslow’s theory as a pyramid?

It was, after all, easier to remember and aesthetically pleasing, especially for PowerPoint presentations. And just like that, Maslow’s nuanced theory was reduced to a simple, step-like structure.

Delving into the origins and implications of this discrepancy offers not only a richer understanding of Maslow’s ideas but also invaluable insights into human nature itself.

The Problem with the Pyramid

So, what’s the fuss about the pyramid representation?

Psychologist Scott Bary Kauffman points out that this model gives a misleading view of ‘advancing through levels’. It suggests that once you achieve a level, like ‘social needs and belonging,’ you never revert or move between levels. But human needs aren’t analogous to a video game; we don’t ‘unlock’ stages to never return.

Maslow himself emphasized the fluidity of needs. A person could be thriving in their career, achieving the esteem needed, while simultaneously grappling with social needs due to loneliness. Our lives are filled with such dualities, and a static pyramid hardly captures this dynamism.

The Fluid Nature of Needs

Life is ever-evolving, and so are our needs. Imagine someone whose career was once a source of immense pride and fulfilment. Over time, circumstances change, and that same job becomes mundane or meaningless. Or consider someone who, after entering a toxic relationship, suddenly finds their safety and security needs jeopardized.

These examples illustrate that our journey through Maslow’s hierarchy isn’t a one-way climb to the top, where one remains perpetually self-actualized. Instead, it’s a continuous dance, moving up and down based on life’s challenges and our internal evolution.

Maslow’s Journey to Spiritual Transcendence

While Maslow’s hierarchy begins with basic physiological needs and progresses upward to safety needs, love, belongingness and esteem, it culminates in what he called “self-actualization.”

In his later work, Maslow expanded on the idea of self-actualization to introduce the concept of “self-transcendence” and “peak experiences.”

This is where he touched upon themes of higher spiritual awareness and the world being more than what meets the eye.

Peak Experiences

Maslow described peak experiences as moments of highest happiness and fulfilment.

They are instances that stand out from everyday events, where a person feels a sense of wonder, awe, and profound meaning.

During these moments, individuals might feel a deep connection to others, to nature, or to a higher power, and they might perceive the world as harmonious and integrated.

Self-Transcendence

In his later work, Maslow added another level above self-actualization in his hierarchy, which he called self-transcendence.

This represents the need to go beyond oneself and to connect to something greater, be it a higher power, the universe, or the collective consciousness.

For Maslow, self-transcendent individuals seek to further a cause beyond their own individual needs and are often motivated by values that unite humanity.

Meta Needs and Meta Motivations

Going further, Maslow identified certain “meta needs” and corresponding “meta motivations” which are the desires and values of self-actualizing or self-transcending individuals.

These include truth, beauty, wholeness, justice, simplicity, richness, and spiritual connection. When these meta needs are not met, a person might feel a kind of spiritual unease or dissatisfaction.

The World Beyond the Physical

While Maslow was primarily a psychologist and not a religious or spiritual teacher, his work on self-actualization and self-transcendence does touch on the idea of there being more to the world than just the material or what we can perceive with our senses.

He believed that humans have a deep need for these transcendent experiences and that they can offer profound insights and a sense of connection to the larger universe.

In essence, Abraham Maslow recognized the human need for spiritual connection and the moments of profound realization that can arise when one connects with the greater universe.

He believed that these experiences were not only beneficial but integral to achieving the highest levels of human potential and well-being.

Rethinking Our Approach to Human Needs

Given the misconceptions and oversimplifications, it might be time to reconsider how we approach Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.

Embrace Complexity

It’s tempting to simplify human behaviour and motivations into neat categories. Yet, our needs are intricate, interwoven, and seldom linear.

Instead of pigeonholing them into rigid levels, we should recognize the fluidity with which we might experience these needs. It’s entirely plausible, for instance, to yearn for a sense of belonging while also seeking esteem or even self-actualization.

Focus on Individual Journeys

No two human experiences are identical. Our personal histories, cultural backgrounds, and life circumstances all influence how we navigate our needs.

Using someone else’s journey as a yardstick for our own can not only be misleading but also diminish our unique experiences and challenges. It’s essential to respect and acknowledge that each individual’s path through these needs is distinct.

Seek Transcendence

Beyond the drive for personal achievement and realization lies the profound realm of self-transcendence.

This involves connecting with something larger than oneself, be it community, nature, or a higher purpose.

In today’s individual-centric world, understanding the value of serving others and dedicating oneself to a greater cause can offer unparalleled fulfilment and meaning.

Stay Open to Evolution

The landscape of psychology is dynamic, with new research and perspectives continually enriching our understanding.

Instead of holding onto dated or oversimplified models, we should remain curious and receptive. Engaging with the latest findings and interpretations ensures that our grasp of human needs remains nuanced and relevant.

The Depth of Human Needs

In our collective quest to understand the myriad dimensions of human motivation and desire, Maslow’s hierarchy has been a guide for many.

I feel that we outgrew the oversimplified representations, like the pyramid, that have become emblematic of his theory.

Human needs, desires, and aspirations are not just stages we sequentially conquer. They are intertwined, overlapping, and ever-evolving entities that shape and are shaped by our unique life experiences.

The more I study psychology, the more clear it is that there’s no singular model that can capture the entirety of human experience. Yet, that doesn’t detract from the significance of Maslow’s insights.

It’s not about discarding the pyramid but about enriching our perspective, acknowledging the layers, and striving for a life of both self-actualization and self-transcendence.

If you enjoyed this, please click the clap icon below, leave a comment and/or share it with someone who you think would enjoy it.